halliburton update as of june 21

Based on the information available thru the USACE website and yesterday's New York Times article, the following is an update on the Halliburton contracts.

Total to date: $840.7 million dollars

Halliburton, issued an assessment and contingency plan for fighting oil well fires under an existing DoD contract issued on December 14, 2001, LOGCAPIII.

A new Implementation Contract for extinguishing well fires was issued thru the Army Corps of Engineers to Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR Engineering & Construction) on March 8, 2003.

Halliburton owns Kellogg Brown & Root. KBR Engineering & Construction owns Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. KBR has also subcontracted to Superior Energy Services' Wild Well Control, Inc.

The New York Times reported on April 10, 2003 that an additional contract was awarded to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

Company Halliburton KBR Government Operations
Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity 10 year contract
Task Orders $596.8 million as of June 20, 2003
Agency Army Material Command
Date of RFP
Pre-planning
Date of Award December 14, 2001
Nature of work For support services to US military in Iraq under LOGCAPIII. KBRGO will provide for the construction of facilities and infrastructure of base camps including billeting, mess hall, food preparation, potable water, sanitation, showers, laundry, transportation, utilities, warehousing and other logistical support. Also included is support of the Reception, Staging, Onward Movement, Integration (RSOI) process of U.S. Forces as they enter or depart their theater of operation by sea, air or rail.
References
Halliburton Press Release
December 17, 2001

Halliburton contract caters to Americans in Iraq
By Mark Fineman / Los Angeles Times
The Detroit News
May 9, 2003

Halliburton Unit Gets Over $800 Million
By Reuters
New York Times
June 20, 2003

Company Kellogg Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Award $7 billion (cost plus 7% Implementation Contract) paid by Task Order
Task Orders $213.786 million as of June 13, 2003 (see below)
Agency U.S. Defense Department
Date of RFP
Pre-planning
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Nature of work Rebuild Iraq's oil production infrastructure
Reference
Halliburton contract could reach $7B
Emergency government contract to fix Iraqi oil fields lasts 2 years, offers 7% profit margin.
April 11, 2003: 2:45 PM EDT
By Mark Gongloff
CNN/Money

Company Kellogg Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Award $30 million
Agency Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Date of RFP
Pre-planning
Date of Award
Nature of work To dismantle and neutralize any chemical or nuclear weapons found in the region
Reference
Competing for Work in Postwar Iraq
By Diana B. Henriques
New York Times
April 10, 2003

Task Orders under the March 8 Implementation Contract

Company Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Subcontractors Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. and Superior Energy Services' Wild Well Control, Inc.
Award See original Implementation Contract
TO 1 $14.7 million (Initially $34M)
Agency USACOE
Pre-planning November 2002
Date of RFP
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Date of additional work order
Nature of work To train and advise for safe shut-down, oil spill equipment propositioning and damage assessment:
Reference
USACE website
Engineer Support to Operation Iraqi Freedom
Frequently asked questions
June 13, 2003
http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/iraq/faq.htm

Company Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Subcontractors Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. and Superior Energy Services' Wild Well Control, Inc.
Award See original Implementation Contract
TO 2 $1.7 million
Agency USACOE
Pre-planning November 2002
Date of RFP
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Date of additional work order
Nature of work Design for quick repair of oil facilities
Reference
USACE website
Engineer Support to Operation Iraqi Freedom
Frequently asked questions
June 13, 2003
http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/iraq/faq.htm

Company Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Subcontractors
Award See original Implementation Contract
TO 3 $87.8 million (Initially $36.9M)
Agency USACOE
Pre-planning November 2002
Date of RFP
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Date of additional work order
Nature of work Damage assessment, fire fighting and repairs
Reference
USACE website
Engineer Support to Operation Iraqi Freedom
Frequently asked questions
June 13, 2003
http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/iraq/faq.htm

Company Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Subcontractors
Award See original Implementation Contract
TO 4 $16.3 million
Agency USACOE
Pre-planning November 2002
Date of RFP
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Date of additional work order
Nature of work Construction of base camp facilities for workers
Reference
USACE website
Engineer Support to Operation Iraqi Freedom
Frequently asked questions
June 13, 2003
http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/iraq/faq.htm

Company Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton)
Subcontractors
Award See original Implementation Contract
TO 5 $93.4 million
Agency USACOE
Pre-planning November 2002
Date of RFP
Date of Award March 8, 2003
Date of additional work order May 4, 2003
Nature of work Preserve distribution capability and fuel distribution support including repairs of fuel product distribution systems, procurement and transportation of refined products to support the Iraqi refining and distribution organizations in order to meet the domestic demand for fuels for power production, domestic humanitarian use within Iraq. (This amount will change because the amounts of gasoline and LPG needed are not finalized. The total amount of gasoline and LPG needed is directly tied to how quickly Iraq can restart the oil system production.)
Reference
USACE website
Engineer Support to Operation Iraqi Freedom
Frequently asked questions
June 13, 2003
http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/iraq/faq.htm

The total NTE amount for the March 8 Implementation Contract is, as of 13 June 2003, $213,786,000. The TO amounts may incrementally increase or decrease. For example: if not all the money put against TO3, for example, is needed and the cost rises for TO5, the extra money in TO3 may be shifted. Even the NTE amount may change if work is increased or if additional funding is provided.